COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH RESPONSE OF SDA–SGA BLENDED CONCRETE FOOTINGS UNDER VARYING SOIL BEARING CONDITIONS
Abstract
This research examines the structural response of concrete pad footings produced with ternary cementitious blends comprising Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC), Sawdust Ash (SDA), and Sponge Gourd Ash (SGA) when founded on five different soil types—clayey, silty, sandy, lateritic, and gravelly—whose bearing capacities range from 150?kN/m² to 250?kN/m². The concrete mixes were designed using an 85:15 cementitious blend ratio (OPC: [SDA?+?SGA]) and a constant mix proportion of 1:2:4, consistent with general practice for footings. A total of five mix variants (M1–M5) were cast, cured for 28 days, and tested for compressive strength using standard procedures. The test results reveal a progressive increase in 28-day compressive strength corresponding with the increasing soil bearing capacity. The lowest strength was recorded by mix M1 on weak, cohesive clayey soil (24.1?MPa), while the highest strength was attained by mix M4 on lateritic soil (27.2?MPa), marking a significant 12.86% improvement over the baseline. This strength enhancement is attributed to the synergistic pozzolanic reactivity of SDA and SGA, which improved the microstructure and densification of the concrete matrix, particularly under supportive soil conditions that minimized differential settlement and stress concentration. These findings confirm the mechanical viability and soil sensitivity of SDA–SGA blended concrete for shallow foundations, especially in structurally favorable soils such as lateritic and gravelly profiles. The environmental and technical advantages observed also highlight the potential of using agro-waste-based cementitious materials to enhance the sustainability and performance of concrete in structural applications.
Keywords: Sawdust ash (SDA), sponge gourd ash (SGA), blended concrete, soil bearing capacity, sustainable foundations
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ACI Committee 232 (2018) ACI 2322R-18 Report on the use of fly ash in concrete American Concrete Institute https://www.concrete.org
ASTM International (2017) ASTM D2487–17 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System) https://www.astm.org
ASTM International (2018) ASTM C33/C33M–18 Standard Specification for Concrete Aggregates https://www.astm.org
ASTM International (2018) ASTM C1602/C1602M–18 Standard Specification for Mixing Water Used in the Production of Hydraulic Cement Concrete https://www.astm.org
ASTM International (2022) ASTM C150/C150M–22 Standard Specification for Portland Cement https://www.astm.org
ASTM International (2022) ASTM C192/C192M–22 Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Laboratory https://www.astm.org
ASTM International (2022) ASTM C618–22 Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use in Concrete https://www.astm.org
ASTM International (2023) ASTM C39/C39M–23 Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens https://www.astm.org/c0039_c0039m- 23.html
ASTM International (2023) ASTM C511–23 Standard Specification for Moist Cabinets Moist Rooms and Water Storage Tanks Used in the Testing of Hydraulic Cements and Concretes https://www.astm.org
Aytekin M (2016) Foundation engineering Behavior and design (2nd ed) Ankara University Press
Aytekin M (2022) Soil mechanics and foundation engineering Springer
British Standards Institution. (2011). BS EN 197-1:2011 – Cement – Part 1: Composition, specifications and conformity criteria for common cements. London: BSI.
British Standards Institution (2013) BS EN 1997-1 Eurocode 7 Geotechnical Design – Part 1 General Rules https://www.bsigroup.com
British Standards Institution (2015) BS 5930 Code of practice for ground investigations https://www.bsigroup.com
British Standards Institution (2015) BS 8004 Code of Practice for Foundations https://www.bsigroup.com
British Standards Institution (2021) BS EN 206 Concrete—Specification performance production and conformity https://www.bsigroup.com
Dabou M Salah B & Toumi A (2021) Effect of subgrade stiffness on shallow footing performance A parametric study International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 15(4) 433–444
Das B M (2010) Principles of foundation engineering (7th ed) Cengage Learning
Fapohunda C Olofinjana A & Omole D O (2023) Pozzolanic properties and mechanical performance of sawdust ash as cement replacement European Journal of Sustainable Engineering Innovations 2(1) 14–22 https://ejsei.com
Mehta P K & Monteiro P J M (2014) Concrete Microstructure properties and materials (4th ed) McGraw-Hill Education
Najar S S Al-Shabeeb A R & Zolotarev K (2025) Advancing soil–structure interaction (SSI) A comprehensive review of current practices challenges and future directions Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience 6(1) 1–19 https://doi.org/10.1186/s43065-025- 00118-2
Neville A M (2011) Properties of concrete (5th ed) Pearson Education Limited
Raheem A A & Adesanya D A (2009) A study of the workability and compressive strength characteristics of SDA–cement concrete Civil Engineering Journal 13(1) 15–22 https://www.grad.hr
Riaz M Tahir M Khan W A & Farooq M (2021) Soil–structure interaction modeling for structural resilience Geosciences 11(2) 72 https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences11020072
Siddique R & Klaus J (2009) Influence of metakaolin on the properties of mortar and concrete A review Applied Clay Science 43(3) 392–400
Terzaghi K & Peck R B (1996) Soil mechanics in engineering practice (3rd ed) Wiley- Interscience
Wasiu A Fapohunda C & Madueke R (2025) Performance evaluation of ternary cementitious blends of sawdust ash and sponge gourd ash in structural concrete Nigerian Association of Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering (NAUJCE) 5(1) 33–41 https://naujcve.com
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2022-2025. Department of Civil Engineering, Nnamdi Azikiwe University. All Rights Reserved..